California Accident & Injury Attorneys
When Results Matter Fighting for the Maximum Compensation You Deserve

Proposition 65: Protecting the Health of Californians

Our environmental law attorneys at Manning Law, APC hold companies accountable for Proposition 65 violations that expose Californians to substances that cause cancer or reproductive harm.

We represent consumer advocacy groups and private citizens with claims against companies that violate Proposition 65. Contact us today for a free consultation.

Companies Must Provide Warnings

California voters approved Proposition 65, also known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. The initiative passed with 63% voting in favor of requiring businesses to provide warnings to Californians about significant exposures to dangerous substances.

Through its required warnings, Proposition 65 alerts consumers in the State of California to the risk of potential exposures to substances causing cancer or reproductive harm. They can then make an informed decision regarding whether to purchase, consume, or use such products.

Unfortunately, not all companies comply with the requirements of Prop 65. Our team at Manning Law, APC fights to ensure Californians know their risk of exposure to toxic substances.

Hundreds of Chemicals Covered by Prop 65

About 900 chemicals are targeted by the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986. These chemicals are known to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. The chemical list includes naturally occurring and synthetic compounds.

Making Companies Answerable for Proposition 65 Violations

Companies that do not warn of toxic substances in their products can be required to pay statutory penalties, but these lawsuits are about more than dollars. Litigation puts businesses on notice that they can be held liable for non-compliance. Legal action tells the people of the Golden State that their health is more important than profit.

Manning Law, APC is known for its civil rights, consumer, and environmental protection litigation including its precedent-setting litigation under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") and the Unruh Civil Rights Act ("UCRA").

In particular, the firm is known for its role as plaintiff's counsel in the first federal appellate case to recognize the application of the ADA and UCRA to websites and mobile applications, see Robles v. Domino's Pizza, LLC, No. 17-55504 (9th Cir. 2019).

View Our Press Releases-

If you believe you have a case, speak with a member of our team by calling (800) 783-5006.

Why Choose Our Firm?

  1. We have Recovered Millions for Our Clients
  2. Over 100 Years of Combined Experience
  3. You Don't Pay Until We Win
  4. We Speak Spanish, Farsi & French
We Don't Charge Anything Unless We Win
  • Please enter your name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
    You entered an invalid number.
  • Please select an option.
  • Please enter a message.